Plague risks in Russia and a dangerous delay on WHO pandemic agreement | Letters

  • 首页
  • 活动
  • 列表
  • 资讯
  • 精选

相关内容推荐

亿万28平台的技术实力解析 - 亿万28
为您的在线业务提供免费推广
亿万28平台的技术实力解析 - 亿万28
提升平台使用体验的9个简单方法
亿万28平台的技术实力解析 - 亿万28
快速优化您平台操作的技巧

Responding to an editorial on a potential plague outbreak, Dr Darren Mann deplores delays to the agreement, while Kent Buse says Britain could do more

Your editorial on the silence from Siberia after a worker died at a plague research institute there is right that the lack of information is the real worry (The Guardian view on plague in Russia: what is most worrying is the lack of information, 18 October). But the deeper failure is not Russian. It is that, six years after Covid, we still have no agreed system for sharing pathogens, or for sharing what is made from them.

I spent three decades in Hong Kong, through bird flu, Sars and Covid, working on outbreak surveillance and sample-sharing between Hong Kong and the UK. It is also where this territorial argument began. In June 1894, two bacteriologists arrived to investigate the plague. Kitasato Shibasaburō was given lab space and immediate access to the bodies. Alexandre Yersin was refused access to the dead, and worked from a straw hut, having to appeal to the governor for his share of cadavers. Access to the material was allocated by favour, not by need. The organism carries the name of the man who was shut out: Yersinia pestis.

Continue reading...